Closed Suggestion for more proof on bans.

Status
Not open for further replies.

quailgg94

Supporter
Jul 13, 2016
121
7
18
30
Invisaland
www.twitch.tv
    • Quailgg94
    • Server
    • Suggesstions for helpers , new admins.
    • i'v seen alot but i do notice ALOT of staff recently banning alot of players constantly, i atleast ask to record them, i used to do it when i was staff i had over 100 gigs of bullcrap 10 second videos. it's not hard. i do understand if u got to ban them instantly because it's something u cant report. it seems alot of people complain about their ''bans being unfair''
    • Side affects of this is less bullcrap about people saying staff on this server ban for no reason''leading to bad reviews to misguided ears.''
  • Also can u please enforce the ban bypassing. ingame i hear people sometimes saying they are someone that was banned, and they never get banned and they continue their onsualght of bullcrap getting muted Every day for sexism , racism .

    • now i do agree staff have every right to ban u on the slightest sneeze ur doing something and then question it later.

    • i also agree with Every one of their bans '' after googling Massive amounts of names'' alot of the people banned on mcfoxcraft are also banned in places like hypixel and other servers .

    • i do think that Even if u tell admins just to do what they want i'd understand, but maybe for helpers tempbanning hackers get them into the process of trying to atleast get some proof before banning them, because yea they will ban them either way with or without proof But proof is sometimes necessary.
 
For helpers, they can only temp-ban for this reason. They have to supply proof to why they banned a player, for a higher staff member to deal with it and decide if what they've shown was enough proof or not. I also take it as "new admins" being directed at me, so I will say I do record most of the people I ban, unless they're a new player who joined just earlier that day.
 
Admins are given the power to ban on will, so, although some "false bans" may occur, it's just how it works. They have enough experience to dictate hacks over non-hackers. It would be nice if they recorded for some cases, and some of them probably do, but they are trusted with banning players. And if a player who was banned is saying they got false banned, how can they prove that they weren't hacking. Basically staff don't have to record, so if you have that much of a problem with it, record yourself playing in case you get "false banned".
 
Admins are given the power to ban on will, so, although some "false bans" may occur, it's just how it works. They have enough experience to dictate hacks over non-hackers. It would be nice if they recorded for some cases, and some of them probably do, but they are trusted with banning players. And if a player who was banned is saying they got false banned, how can they prove that they weren't hacking. Basically staff don't have to record, so if you have that much of a problem with it, record yourself playing in case you get "false banned".
But if the player in question claims they were false banned it should be up to the staff to prove they had reason to ban not the player as not everyone records 24/7.
 
But if the player in question claims they were false banned it should be up to the staff to prove they had reason to ban not the player as not everyone records 24/7.
As a staff member they're authority and word is what should determine the final verdict of the person who was "false banned". If they staff member can provide why they were banned and the hack they were using. That should be enough. The player who was "false banned" can make an appeal and if that doesn't work (and if they actually care enough) they should buy an un-ban.
 
As a staff member they're authority and word is what should determine the final verdict of the person who was "false banned". If they staff member can provide why they were banned and the hack they were using. That should be enough. The player who was "false banned" can make an appeal and if that doesn't work (and if they actually care enough) they should buy an un-ban.
They are like 13-16 mainly they hardly have "authority" in this world now do they. Besides as the staff member it is should be up to them to provide the evidence why should a falsely banned player buy a unban when they shouldn't even be banned besides we all know if you say you got false banned in your ban appeal its an instant deny.
 
Then they should record 24/7, and thats never gonna happend.

Btw admins habe the right to ban ppl, if there banned they could better make a ban appeal.
 
Everyone makes ban appeals, even the people who hack to it. I have seen ban appeals from people that have been recorded hacking. These people just get shown the video evidence of their hacking and they still dont shut up sometimes. :P
 
Everyone makes ban appeals, even the people who hack to it. I have seen ban appeals from people that have been recorded hacking. These people just get shown the video evidence of their hacking and they still dont shut up sometimes. :p
What if the supposed hacks isn't very clear the staff should have multiple videos as solid evidence not just one it's easy to fake it.
 
What if the supposed hacks isn't very clear the staff should have multiple videos as solid evidence not just one it's easy to fake it.
Making multiple videos is a waste of time, when one good video is all that is needed lmao. It's easy to fake hacks, and if your faking it, you should be banned anyway buddy.
 
It can be almost anything but maybe anti-kb isnt in that almost anything lol.
Fly hacks are easy to find. V-clipping is easy to find. Aimbot is easy to find. NoSlowDown is easy to find. Kill Aura is easy to find. Reach is easy to find. Jesus is east to find.
[doublepost=1490288694,1490288653][/doublepost]
Could be also lag cuz fox lags 24/7 xD
No, because if someoen is moving they can't move either, but if they are moving and are not taking kb then it is anti kb :P
 
Status
Not open for further replies.