Closed Revamp KitPVP

Status
Not open for further replies.

2Hawk/FatBirdie

New Member
Jun 9, 2016
101
7
0
25
  • *Your in-game name: 2Hawk
  • *Is your suggestion for the server and/or forum: Server
  • *Description of suggestion: Remove autoban
  • Possible side effects of suggestion: less lag, and less people leaving permanently because they're falsely kicked for hacking every 5 minutes
  • Screenshot/Video showing suggestion: I will post one in a couple days.

Just as a side note, I have read the hate mail for the new KitPVP, which I frankly, love. I rarely have problems, and they're mostly just me getting kicked for hacking. I know that Cloak will not bring back the old one, and I never saw that one. But it is possible to make this one better.

Thank you for your time
 
  • Like
Reactions: TGMDom
Seems alright I like it except the fact that it is going to be iron pvp
I think you have a good point, and I have no problem with the kits having any other type of armor as long as there is no way for players to buy (with in-game money) stronger armor in shops.

Let's say the kits had Leather Armor. If someone were to have full diamond it would be nearly impossible for someone in leather armor to fight them, no matter how good they were at pvp.

Other than that, I don't see a problem with kits having any other type of armor, as long as the weapon each kit has isn't too powerful compared to the kit's armor (for example, it would be too powerful if a kit had full leather armor and a sharpness 2 diamond sword. That would kill players in very few hits)
 
RANK SYSTEM!!!! seriously... so many people would like to start with a nooby kit and work your way up! donators only get boosts to x2 money, cosmetics, and crate drops with random decent gear!!
 
Im just curious if theres any way that cloakfox or someone else can refill the anvils at spawn... we're almost out. Thanks
 
@XJarredTheGreatX brings up a great point. I too have my own ranking system in mind. Please read the following and tell me your opinion on it.

My idea of how a ranking system should work:

  • Ranks should be levels, i.e. a new player starts off at Level 1.
  • Each time a player kills another player, they gain a certain amount of XP AND some money.
  • At low levels, it doesn't take much XP to level up, but at higher levels, it takes more XP to level up (Higher level = more XP to level up).
  • The amount of XP a player gets from killing someone NEVER changes, however, the amount of money a player gets for killing someone else increases every time they level up (So, a Level 50 player would get a lot more money per kill than a Level 5 player).
  • Money can be used to buy stuff at a shop, which can be accessed by /warp shop.
  • Stuff at the shop could be armor, potions, golden apples, fishing rods, epears, exp bottles, etc.
  • And just to make ranking up more interesting, I've provided a list of ranks for certain levels below. The ranks could also be colored in game to add more
Level 1 = Apprentice
Level 2 = Novice
Level 3 = Junior
Level 5 = Journeyman
Level 7 = Platinum (should be white)
Level 10 =
Master
Level 13 = Ultimate
Level 18 = Champion
Level 25 = Demigod
Level 34 = God
Level 45 = Legendary
Level 57 = Titan
Level 75 = Warlord
 
This is a message for cloak, as I do agree strongly with your suggestion I think that HPatrols SHOULD be added back. Have a fresh new set of HPatrols and experienced staff can help them. I would definitely apply for another shot at HPatrol because that was one of my best times on Foxcraft! 71% of people agree with me on the poll that AAC isn't as efficient as a human, now I see 5-20 people on every day and it fluctuates a lot. Even though there aren't many people on the revamp can hype everyone up for a new kitpvp.
[doublepost=1467668175,1467667988][/doublepost]Also, following up from my last response, I think HPatrols should have a say in hacker reports. Not able to accept or decline, but rather give the person who is reporting the player an assurance of them being banned or to say they are not hacking.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.